Outside employment law, the firm has considerable legal and technical expertise and experience in areas associated with what may broadly be described as ‘Freedom Rights’.
From March 2020, the firm expanded its work in unexpected directions. While the government, politicians and media told us to be fearful of a respiratory virus, we were far more concerned that a virus was being used as an excuse to remove freedom from all citizens.
We continued to maintain the highest services for our existing clients, most of whom survived the lockdown of the economy and moved from strength to strength. However, we are also proud to have fought to protect the nation’s freedoms and its children in particular. Offering advice, often pro bono, and pursing leading cases through the Tribunals and High Courts, including to the Court of Appeal, we fought:
- masks in schools and colleges
- vaccine mandates for care workers
- vaccine mandates in the NHS
- vaccination for children (who were never at risk and did not need it)
We were successful in getting Sajid Javid’s legislation for vaccine mandates in the NHS repealed before it came into force in March 2022. We obtained a Court Order establishing children could not be required to wear masks in schools. We are proud to have played a leading role in keeping the numbers of children injected with the covid-19 mRNA ‘vaccines’ to very low percentage levels (5% to 10%) compared with most of Europe.
While most law firms refused to entertain any of these cases – and were probably mostly ignorant of the issues or anything not appearing in mainstream press and likely could not have helped – we did the work, the research and we stood up.
Our expertise in employment law was extremely helpful to understand the wide range of issues, not least in discrimination and human rights. Looking forward, we continue to advise and act for numerous clients defending their rights to free speech. We have also pursued complex Judicial Review cases and we successfully assisted several families facing vaccination orders in the Court of Protection, a special court dealing with vulnerable individuals.
We are proud to have helped a mother defend her son, ‘Tom’, a physically healthy 24-year-old with a mental age of 18 months, who was chased by the authorities through the Court of Protection for 3 years to have the mRNA vaccine even though he’d had covid and nothing more than a sniffle. Following a final hearing in July 2024, the Court finally accepted vaccination was not in his best interests. While the mainstream media have stayed away from reporting most of the cases we have pursued, in another breakthrough the case was reported by The Telegraph.
We continue fighting for what is right, for freedom of the individual against unnecessary interference of the State and those appointed by the State. If you or your business is affected by such interference with your freedoms, then get in touch. If we cannot help, we may well know someone who can.
We have left access to some ‘Coronavirus’ pages that we hope will remain of historical and nostalgic interest only.